![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
"If the fifteenth century saw the appearance of numbers of Latin-derived multisyllabic words … it also witnessed important … phonological developments. During the fifteenth century, the system of long vowels in Middle English commenced a series of interconnected changes which radically affected the pronunciation of standard English, distancing it from the vowel systems of Continental languages." (Burnley, 2000: 143) |
Burnley is of course referring to the Great Vowel Shift. However, as he observes, linguistic innovations were already taking place prior to the arrival of the Norman French. In terms of phonology, both vowels and consonants were undergoing change in the late Old English (OE) period. These features are examined below together with the Middle English (ME) forms from which Yorkshire vowels and diphthongs are ultimately derived.
The Great Vowel Shift: the term used to refer to the changes,
occurring at the end of the Middle English period, which affected the
pronunciation of the seven English long vowels. For example, the Middle
English sound [![]() |
Vowels
Long vowels
Table 1 summarizes the position regarding the English long vowels where
changes began to take place in the OE period. It will be noted that, apart from
,
and
, the majority of these vowels
maintained their characteristics into the ME period.
Table 1
Old English | Middle English | |||
Vowel | Example words | Approximate realization |
Vowel |
Approximate realization |
![]() |
![]() |
[a:] as in father |
![]() |
[ |
![]() |
![]() |
[e:] as in German zehn |
![]() |
[![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[i:] as in tree |
![]() |
[![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[o:] as in German wo |
![]() |
[![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[u:] as in chew |
![]() |
[![]() |
|
![]() |
[y:] as in German Bühne |
![]() |
[![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[a:] as in a lengthened form of hat |
![]() |
[![]() |
* remained as ![]() |
After Barber 1993: 15 |
Short vowels
The English short vowels were also the subject of change. Burnley (2000) notes,
among other things, that during this period short vowels began to be lengthened
before certain consonant groups (e.g. ld, rd, rl, rn,
mb, nd and ng). For example, Anglian cald became
cld and later, through rounding of the vowel,
modern cold. Conversely, long vowels shortened before two-consonant clusters
(other than the above). Thus g
dspell
("gospel") became godspell. However, as observed by Pyles and Algeo (1993),
the lengthening mentioned above was often not self-sustaining and, at the close
of the ME period, occurred only in
Open syllable: one ending (phonetically) with a vowel sound, e.g. profile, carbon. The following are closed syllables: lantern, dismal. |
Middle English Open Syllable Lengthening (MEOSL)
According to Smith (1996), this phenomenon occurred much later than
the developments described above and commonly involved the short vowels a,
e and o. These vowels were lengthened when they occurred in the
stressed open
syllable of a disyllabic word. For example:
Table 2
Stressed syllable | Old English | Middle English | Contemporary English |
Open | fa-ran | f |
go |
ba-can | b |
bake | |
Closed | þan-cian | than-ken | thank |
After Smith (1996: 96) |
It should be noted that, in English, when a single consonant falls between two vowels it is normally associated with the second syllable. However, when two consonants occur, the first is linked to the first syllable and the second with the final one.
Smith (1996) claims that MEOSL happened sooner and was more advanced in the North because of the earlier erosion of inflectional endings (see Loss of Inflections). Further information about the quantitative changes in late OE vowels can be obtained from: Smith 1996: 96 et seq; Campbell, 1959: 120-2; Hogg 1992a: 210-14.
Consonants
In comparison to vowels, claim Pyles and Algeo (1993: 143), English consonants
have displayed a relative constancy throughout the history of the language.
For example, they note that Old English b, c (realized as either
[k] or [t]),
d, f (values [f] and [v]), h (realized as both [h] and
[x]), k, l , m, p, r, s, t,
þ, w and x (i.e. [ks]) remained the same in Middle English.
However, the OE character
became
ME
"yogh"
(though the latter had only two values, [y] and [x], as opposed to three (see
OE Phonology). This is not to say that the consonants
were entirely unaffected as there were a number of important innovations. For
example:
In OE,
voiced fricatives had simply been allophones
of the voiceless ones but, in the transition to Middle English, they became
true phonemes.
Smith (1996) illustrates this process of phonemicisation
using [s] and [z]. In Old English the distribution of these phonemes was allophonic
and there is a consensus of opinion that /s/ was used in word-final position
whilst /z/ was employed intervocalically. Thus, for example, the Old English
forms of "house" (noun) and "house" (verb) were respectively hs
[hu:s] and h
sian [hu:zian].
Following inflectional erosion during the ME period, a new minimal
pair [hu:s] and [hu:z] was formed and /s/ became differentiated phonemically
from /z/.
Allophone: term used to describe any variant of a single
phoneme. For example, in English, <a> is nasalized (realized as
[![]() ![]() |
Phoneme: may be defined as the smallest linguistic sound unit capable of distinguishing between words. For example, cot and pot differ only in their initial sounds. /c/ and /p/ are therefore regarded as phonemes. |
Phonemicisation: when two allophonic realizations of an original phoneme begin to be used in circumstances where selection of either one or the other alters the meaning of a word. See Smith's example following. |
Minimal pairs: pairs of words in a language, each of which has a different meaning, which differ from one another by only one phoneme e.g. dog and dig; pay and pad; cut and put. |
Voiced fricatives: sounds produced by bringing two articulators (e.g. tongue and upper teeth) together but not close enough to stop the airflow (thus creating friction) whilst simultaneously causing the vocal chords to vibrate. This example produces the sound of [ð] as in the. Other examples are [v] and [z]. |
The derivation of Yorkshire vowels
The following table details the origins of Yorkshire vowels and is based on Wakelin's (1977) analysis of Northern speech sounds. (Using your mouse to point to any item shown in red type will result in the appearance of a message box containing additional information.) The first column headed "RP realization" contains the phonetic symbols for the sounds (underlined in the example words) as they are realized in British Standard English. The symbols in red represent the pronunciation in Yorkshire dialect. Northern dialect refers to NER speech whilst WR dialect falls within the North Midlands dialect area (see Traditional Dialect Areas in the Phonology section).
RP realization | Northern | North Midland |
Wakelin's comments and page reference
| |
| cow, down, house. |
|
![]() |
<ME
![]() |
ground, pound |
|
![]() |
<ME ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() | fool, goose, spoon, |
|
|
< ME ![]() |
![]() | bone, road, stone |
![]() |
|
North and East Yorkshire forms can be , ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
coal, coat, hole. |
![]() |
|
<ME ![]() |
|
![]() | eat, meat, speak. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
< ME ![]() |
![]() | blind, find, climb |
|
|
< ME ![]() ![]() |
![]() | long, wrong |
![]() |
![]() | <ME -ang / -ong. The former is located north of the Humber, the latter to the south. |
RP realization: the pronunciation employing British Standard English (often referred to as BBC English) which displays no regional variation. RP is an abbreviation of Received Pronunciation. |
<ME : indicates derivation from Middle English. |
|
undiphthongized: a diphthong is a sound consisting of two vowels where one glides into another e.g.: the sound in tie is made up vowel /a/ gliding into /i/. A sound which is undiphthongized therefore consists of a pure vowel. |
SED: The Survey of English Dialects initiated by Eugen Dieth and Harold Orton. |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
isogloss: a boundary line (on a map) within which a particular feature of dialect is spoken. |
![]() |
Sources
Barber, C. (1993) The English language: a historical introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burnley, D. (2000) The History of the English Language: a source book, Second Edition, London: Longman.
Campbell, A. (1959) Old English Grammar, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hogg, R. (1992a) A Grammar of Old English, Vol 1: Phonology, Oxford:Blackwell.
Pyles, T. and Algeo, J. (1993) The Origins and Development of the English Language, Fourth Edition, London: Harcourt Brace.
Smith, J. (1996), An historical study of English: function, form and change, London:Routledge.
Wakelin, M.F. (1977) English Dialects: An Introduction, Revised Edition, London: The Athlone Press.